Cooperative Games in MultiAgent Systems
نویسندگان
چکیده
In both human and artificial societies some activities are only allowed to coalitions that satisfy certain criteria, e.g., to sufficiently large coalitions or coalitions which involve players of sufficient seniority. Simmons (1988) formalised this idea in the context of secret sharing schemes by defining the concept of a (disjunctive) hierarchical access structure. The mathematical concept which describe access structures of secret sharing schemes is that of a simple game. In this paper we aim to start a systematic study of hierarchical games, both disjunctive and conjunctive, and our results show that they deserve such a treatment. We prove the duality between disjunctive and conjunctive hierarchical games. We introduce a canonical representation theorem for both and characterise disjunctive hierarchical games as complete games with a unique shiftmaximal losing coalition. We give a short combinatorial proof of the Beimel-Tassa-Weinreb characterisation theorem of weighted disjunctive hierarchical games. By duality we get similar theorems for conjunctive hierarchical games.
منابع مشابه
A TRANSITION FROM TWO-PERSON ZERO-SUM GAMES TO COOPERATIVE GAMES WITH FUZZY PAYOFFS
In this paper, we deal with games with fuzzy payoffs. We proved that players who are playing a zero-sum game with fuzzy payoffs against Nature are able to increase their joint payoff, and hence their individual payoffs by cooperating. It is shown that, a cooperative game with the fuzzy characteristic function can be constructed via the optimal game values of the zero-sum games with fuzzy payoff...
متن کاملReinforcement social learning of coordination in cooperative multiagent systems
Coordination in cooperative multiagent systems is an important problem and has received a lot of attention in multiagent learning literature. Most of previous works study the problem of how two (or more) players can coordinate on Pareto-optimal Nash equilibrium(s) through fixed and repeated interactions in the context of cooperative games. However, in practical complex environments, the interac...
متن کاملCooperative games and multiagent systems
Forming coalitions is a generic means for cooperation: people, robots, web services, resources, firms, they can all improve their performance by joining forces. The use of coalitions has been successful in domains such as task allocations, sensor networks, and electronic marketplaces. Forming efficient coalitions requires the identification of matching synergies between different entities (find...
متن کاملCooperative Benefit and Cost Games under Fairness Concerns
Solution concepts in cooperative games are based on either cost games or benefit games. Although cost games and benefit games are strategically equivalent, that is not the case in general for solution concepts. Motivated by this important observation, a new property called invariance property with respect to benefit/cost allocation is introduced in this paper. Since such a property can be regar...
متن کاملComplexity of stability-based solution concepts in multi-issue and MC-net cooperative games
MC-nets constitute a natural compact representation scheme for cooperative games in multiagent systems. In this paper, we study the complexity of several natural computational problems that concern solution concepts such as the core, the least core and the nucleolus. We characterize the complexity of these problems for a variety of subclasses of MC-nets, also considering constraints on the game...
متن کاملThe Dynamics of Reinforcement Social Learning in Cooperative Multiagent Systems
Coordination in cooperative multiagent systems is an important problem in multiagent learning literature. In practical complex environments, the interactions between agents can be sparse, and each agent’s interacting partners may change frequently and randomly. To this end, we investigate the multiagent coordination problems in cooperative environments under the social learning framework. We co...
متن کامل